Botting in Rise of Kingdoms has become a controversial subject among players, raising important questions about fair competition, repetitive gameplay, and the future of the game. From automated gem farming to barbarian fort rallies, third-party programs can perform tasks that would otherwise require hours of manual activity.
While some players consider botting an unfair advantage, others argue that the game’s demanding daily routines encourage people to search for automation tools.
But why do players use bots in the first place? How do these programs affect legitimate players? And could Lilith Games reduce botting by improving the game’s existing systems?
Let’s examine the Rise of Kingdoms botting problem, the different types of automation, and practical solutions that could benefit the community.
What Is Botting in Rise of Kingdoms?
Botting refers to using automated software, scripts, or other unauthorized tools to perform gameplay activities without requiring continuous manual input.
In Rise of Kingdoms (ROK), players normally control their cities, commanders, armies, and resources through the game’s interface. However, automation programs can simulate some of these interactions and repeat them according to predefined instructions.
Depending on the software, automated activities may include gathering resources, attacking barbarians, joining rallies, collecting gems, or managing multiple accounts.
Not every third-party tool is necessarily a gameplay bot. Websites offering commander guides, calculators, or alliance planning resources serve a different purpose from software that automatically controls in-game actions.
However, Lilith Games explicitly prohibits bots and third-party software designed to provide an unfair gameplay advantage under its official terms of service.
Players can review those restrictions in the official Lilith Games Terms of Service.
Different Types of Bots Used in Rise of Kingdoms
Not all ROK bots perform the same tasks. Understanding their different purposes helps explain why automation appeals to certain players and why it creates concerns for others.
1. Gem Farming Bots
Gems are among the most valuable currencies in Rise of Kingdoms. Players can use them for various purchases and progression-related activities.
Gem farming bots attempt to automate the process of locating and gathering gems on the kingdom map.
Instead of manually finding deposits and repeatedly sending gathering marches, automated software can attempt to handle these actions with reduced player involvement.
This creates a potential competitive advantage because players using automation may collect resources during periods when they would otherwise be offline.
For legitimate players who spend substantial time gathering manually, competing against automated accounts can feel frustrating and unfair.
2. Barbarian Fort Bots
Barbarian forts are an important part of Rise of Kingdoms gameplay, allowing alliance members to participate in rallies and earn rewards.
However, organizing repeated fort rallies requires player attention, coordination, and action point management.
Some botting systems attempt to automate rally creation, participation, and other repetitive interactions.
This can potentially allow automated accounts to complete large numbers of rallies with much less manual effort.
The problem is not simply that players want to complete more forts. It is that automation can create an uneven playing field between players performing these activities manually and those relying on prohibited software.
3. Barbarian Hunting Bots
Barbarian hunting is another repetitive activity, particularly when players want to use their available action points efficiently.
Automation tools may attempt to locate barbarians, dispatch armies, and repeat attacks without continuous supervision.
Although these activities may appear simple individually, automating them over extended periods can reduce the time investment normally associated with earning rewards.
4. Resource Farming Bots
Resource gathering is essential for upgrading buildings, researching technology, training troops, and preparing for war.
Resource farming bots attempt to automate gathering marches, making it easier to maintain a steady supply of food, wood, stone, and gold.
The potential impact becomes more significant when automation is combined with multiple farming accounts.
Such systems may create advantages that ordinary players cannot easily match without investing significantly more time.
5. Multi-Account Automation
Some players manage multiple Rise of Kingdoms accounts for farming, alliance support, or other gameplay activities.
Managing several accounts manually can become time-consuming, especially when performing the same actions repeatedly.
Multi-account automation attempts to reduce that workload by controlling activities across different accounts.
However, automating multiple accounts can amplify the advantages of botting and potentially affect the competitive balance within a kingdom.
Why Do Players Use Bots in Rise of Kingdoms?
Understanding why players turn to automation is essential when discussing possible solutions.
Although some people use bots primarily to gain competitive advantages, repetitive gameplay and time pressure may also contribute to the demand.
Repetitive Daily Activities
Rise of Kingdoms includes numerous recurring activities. Gathering resources, spending action points, hunting barbarians, and participating in fort rallies can require substantial attention.
These activities are important for progression, but repeating them every day may eventually feel more like completing a checklist than enjoying a strategy game.
Competition Between Players
Rise of Kingdoms is highly competitive, particularly during events such as Kingdom versus Kingdom (KvK).
Players want stronger commanders, sufficient resources, and enough progression to support their kingdoms.
When players believe others are gaining advantages through automation, they may feel pressure to find similar shortcuts.
Limited Playing Time
Not everyone can spend several hours playing every day.
Players balancing work, education, family responsibilities, and other commitments may struggle to maintain the same activity levels as highly dedicated players.
However, limited playing time does not justify violating game rules. Instead, it highlights an opportunity for developers to make repetitive activities more manageable.
How Botting Affects Fair Gameplay
The biggest concern surrounding Rise of Kingdoms botting is its potential impact on competitive fairness.
Automated systems can reduce the effort required to perform certain activities, making it difficult for legitimate players to compete on equal terms.
Here is a comparison between manual gameplay and prohibited automation.
| Activity | Manual Gameplay | Automated Gameplay |
|---|---|---|
| Gem Gathering | Requires players to find and gather gems manually. | Software may repeatedly search for and gather gems. |
| Barbarian Forts | Requires rally coordination and player interaction. | Programs may automate certain rally activities. |
| Barbarian Hunting | Players manually select targets and manage armies. | Software may repeat hunting actions automatically. |
| Resource Gathering | Requires gathering march management. | Software may handle repeated gathering tasks. |
| Multiple Accounts | Requires individual account management. | Programs may automate activities across accounts. |
Automation can undermine the value of time and effort invested by legitimate players. It can also encourage an environment where players believe they need unauthorized software to remain competitive.
Over time, that perception could damage trust within the community.
Is Botting Allowed in Rise of Kingdoms?
No. Lilith Games prohibits the use of bots, cheats, exploits, hacks, and third-party software designed to provide an unfair advantage.
Its terms also prohibit certain automated methods of accessing its services.
Players who violate these rules risk enforcement actions, including possible account suspension or termination.
There are additional security concerns. Downloading unknown automation programs can expose players to malicious software, credential theft, or other cybersecurity risks.
Even when a third-party tool appears to function correctly, that does not mean it is safe, officially approved, or permitted.
Could Lilith Reduce Botting by Improving the Game?
Simply banning accounts may discourage some players, but enforcement alone does not necessarily address the reasons people seek automation.
A broader approach could combine stronger anti-cheat measures with carefully designed quality-of-life improvements.
1. Improve Barbarian Fort Rally Systems
One possible solution would be introducing an official system that simplifies repetitive fort participation.
For example, Lilith could consider a limited rally queue or participation preference system that reduces repeated tapping while preserving action point costs and existing reward limits.
Such a feature would require careful balancing to prevent excessive reward generation or unintended advantages.
The objective should be reducing unnecessary repetition rather than creating unlimited automated progression.
2. Make Barbarian Hunting More Convenient
Lilith could explore features that reduce the number of repetitive interactions involved in barbarian hunting.
Possibilities include improved target selection, more convenient march controls, or limited repeat-action systems.
Any official automation would need reasonable restrictions to maintain fair progression.
3. Improve Resource Gathering Management
Managing gathering marches across several commanders can become tedious.
Better gathering presets, improved march management, and clearer resource-node information could make the experience more convenient.
These improvements would help regular players without necessarily increasing the total amount of resources available.
4. Strengthen Anti-Bot Detection and Enforcement
Quality-of-life improvements should not replace anti-cheat enforcement.
Lilith could continue improving its ability to identify suspicious automated behavior while providing fair review processes for disputed enforcement decisions.
Clear communication about prohibited activities would also help players understand the boundaries between acceptable tools and unauthorized automation.
5. Consider Better Progression Options for Casual Players
Reducing repetitive requirements could make Rise of Kingdoms more accessible to players with limited free time.
Better activity management and balanced progression systems may decrease the appeal of third-party automation.
However, these are proposals for discussion, not confirmed features or announced plans from Lilith Games.
What About Gem Farming Bots?
Gem farming presents a particularly difficult challenge because gems are a valuable currency.
Introducing unrestricted automated gem gathering could create serious balancing problems and potentially affect the game’s economy.
At the same time, ignoring automated gem farming would not resolve the competitive concerns raised by legitimate players.
A reasonable approach would involve effective enforcement alongside an evaluation of how players earn gems through legitimate gameplay.
Possible improvements could include more accessible, balanced earning opportunities or changes to activities that encourage excessive repetitive grinding.
Finding a fair solution would require careful consideration of game balance, progression, and the interests of different player groups.
My Opinion on Rise of Kingdoms Botting: Watch the Discussion
I recently shared my thoughts about the Rise of Kingdoms botting controversy on my gaming YouTube channel, eAgle.
In the video, I discuss different forms of botting, including gem farming, barbarian hunting, barbarian fort automation, and resource farming.
I also share possible solutions and explain why I believe addressing repetitive gameplay could be an important part of the discussion.
Rather than looking at botting only as a cheating problem, I think it is worth examining why players want these tools and whether official gameplay improvements could reduce that demand.
Watch my video: Rise of Kingdoms Botting Discussion: Problems and Possible Solutions.
If you play Rise of Kingdoms, I would also like to hear your opinion. Should Lilith introduce carefully limited automation features, or should every activity remain completely manual?
Frequently Asked Questions About Rise of Kingdoms Botting
Can you get banned for using bots in Rise of Kingdoms?
Yes. Lilith Games prohibits bots and unauthorized software that provides unfair advantages. Violations can result in account enforcement, including suspension or termination.
Are Rise of Kingdoms bots safe?
Third-party bots carry risks. Besides violating game rules, untrusted software may compromise device security or account information.
Why do players use barbarian fort bots?
Some players use automation to reduce the repetitive effort involved in starting or joining large numbers of fort rallies. This can provide an unfair advantage over manual participation.
Should Rise of Kingdoms introduce official automation?
Limited, carefully balanced convenience features could be worth considering. However, unrestricted automation could damage progression balance and competitive fairness.
Conclusion: Rise of Kingdoms Needs Fair Competition and Better Gameplay
The Rise of Kingdoms botting controversy raises two important issues: protecting legitimate players from unfair advantages and making repetitive gameplay more enjoyable.
Players deserve fair competition, but developers should also consider why certain activities encourage people to seek shortcuts.
Stronger enforcement, better gameplay systems, and thoughtful quality-of-life improvements could help address both concerns.
Ultimately, the goal should not be to make everything automatic. It should be to preserve the strategy, teamwork, and competition that make Rise of Kingdoms enjoyable.
What do you think Lilith should do about botting? Watch my Rise of Kingdoms botting discussion and share your suggestions in the comments.
